Legal Opinion

The Hurstdale

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 10, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

On the taxation of costs in this action, a question is presented whether the successful party is entitled to recover the disbursements necessarily made in giving a stipulation for value. The claimant in giving such a stipulation incurred an expense of $50.19, paid to bankers in England, and it was objected to, and the objection sustained by the clerk, probably because there is no direct authority for the taxation. It has, however, become the settled practice to allow disbursements made to surety companies for the same purpose. I am unable to see any distinction in this…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Land Oberoesterreich v. GudeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API