Legal Opinion

State v. Skorpen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 2, 1990No. 12200-6-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Faris, J. *

David Skorpen appeals his conviction of theft in the second degree. Skorpen found and attempted to pass a check that had been forged previously by another in the amount of $375. Skorpen requested a jury trial on an amended 2-count information that charged forgery and theft in the second degree by appropriating lost or misde-livered property. The court ruled, as a matter of law, that a forged check has a value equal to its face amount.

Following the court's ruling, the parties stipulated to the following facts: While on a street in the Longview-Kelso area on April 19, 1988, Skorpen…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of GimlettWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. MarquesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. State v. EastonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. MadewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LampleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. United States v. BanfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. LampleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API