Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Barber

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00064Unknown

1Opinion

FORIN T THHEE M UINDIDTLEED D SITSATTREICST D OISFT PREICNTN SCYOLUVRATN IA ISAIAH HUMPHRIES, No. 4:20-CV-00064 Plaintiff, (Judge Brann) v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, JAMES FRANKLIN, and DAMION BARBER, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION JUNE 16, 2020 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Isaiah Humphries has moved for leave to amend his complaint a second time.1 Defendants have responded.2 The Court grants Humphries’ motion in part and denies it in part. II. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standards for Leave to Amend It is well settled in this Circuit that leave to amend should be freely granted. Indeed, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Bechtel v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Jose Rolo v. City Investing Company Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Doe v. Brown UniversityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API