Legal Opinion
White v. Safe Guard Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 1923No. 11729PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.
Plaintiff's principal contention, and the one which, must be decisive on this appeal, is that the trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. This ruling by the court was based upon evidence relating to proof of loss under the terms of the policy. The applicable provisions of the policy sued on read as follows:
"If fire- occur the insured shall give immediate notice of any loss thereby in' writing to this company, protect the property from further damage, forthwith separate the damaged and undamaged, personal property, put it in the best possible…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nance v. Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. MittendorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Arkansas Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Century Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HighleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- American Ins. Co. v. OttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- American Alliance Insurance Co. v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942