Crown Hotel v. Friedman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINTON, Judge.
Appellants, employer/carrier, bring this case for a second review of an order entered by the deputy commissioner in February, 1982, and for review of orders entered in January and February, 1983.
In his initial order, the deputy found claimant Friedman’s injury to be compensa-ble and awarded certain benefits but withheld determination of the patently mature issue of wage loss that was squarely in controversy. Relying on Town of Palm Beach, et al. v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), we dismissed the employer/carrier’s appeal from the February, 1982 order, finding it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Broward Indus. Plating, Inc. v. WeibyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Wash House v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Town of Palm Beach v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- General Electric Company v. HawkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Crown Hotel v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parker Lumber Co. v. HartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Escambia County Board of County Commissioners v. ReederDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994