Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Evening News Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1984No. Docket 70854PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Daniels, J.

In this action for libel, defendant appeals by leave granted from a circuit court order denying its motion for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1). Such a motion for summary judgment tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint and should not be granted unless, accepting as true all well-pled facts in the complaint, the plaintiff’s claims are so clearly unenforceable as a matter of law that no factual development could possibly justify a right to recover. See, for example, Karr v Bd of Trustees of Michigan State University, 119 Mich App 1, 3-4; 325 NW2d 605 (1982).

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meeropol v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Postill v. Booth Newspapers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Lee v. WestonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kelly v. Johnson Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Justice v. Belo Broadcasting Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKee v. CosbyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Morganroth v. WhitallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Sawabini v. DesenbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Kurz v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Hodgins Kennels, Inc v. DurbinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API