Degraw v. Exide Technologies
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed an action alleging that defendant violated state law by retaliating against plaintiff for exercising his rights under the State of Kansas workers’ compensation statute. Plaintiff also alleges that defendant violated the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) by unlawfully retaliating against and interfering with plaintiffs exercise of his FMLA rights. This case is before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS
Summary judgment is proper if it is demonstrated that the movant is…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miles v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 500District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Cartesha Carson v. Golden Oaks Healthcare, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Conge v. City of OlatheCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
- Wilson v. Saint Francis Ministries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019