Legal Opinion

People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30 (3). The newly discovered evidence, consisting of a hearsay statement by a witness that was inconsistent with his trial testimony, did not "create a probability” that the outcome "would have been more favorable” to defendant if it had been admitted at trial (CPL 330.30 [3]; see, People v Cullen, 175 AD2d 658, lv denied 78 NY2d 1010). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defendant’s cross-examination of the police officer who prepared…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. BetheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. OcasioNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API