United States v. Russell v. Losing, Jr., United States of America v. Donald Ray Feick
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.
These direct criminal appeals are now before us for plenary review following proceedings in the district court pursuant to our order of partial remand dated July 30, 1976. United States v. Losing, 539 F.2d 1174 (8th Cir. 1976). We affirm.
In our prior opinion we held that defendants-appellants Donald Ray Feick and Russell Victor Losing, Jr., were entitled to an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of determining whether a Government wiretap complied with the minimization requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 2518(5). The district court has conducted the hearing and has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Joanne GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Bahman Mansoori, Mark Cox, Mohammad Mansoori, Kenneth Choice, and Terry YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Marisa Lemm, United States of America v. Phyllis Ellen Stonys, United States of America v. Val Bolton MagheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- William Ray JOHNSON, Appellant, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.