Legal Opinion

Samuel Shapiro & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 14, 1963No. Reap. Dec. 10424; Entry Nos. 2892; 3402Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oltvee, Chief Judge:

The above-enumerated appeals for reap-praisement were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel, reading as follows:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the court, that the reappraisement appeals specified above, are limited to the items identified on the invoices with the sizes 48” x 30” or the size 60” x 30”, and that said items consist of birch plywood from Finland of the same kind,in all material respects, and subject to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Arbit Trading Co.United States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API