Legal Opinion

Davis v. State Farm Automobile Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 18, 2005No. 05-72354Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND 1

COHN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This is an insurance dispute. Plaintiff Michael Davis is suing defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) for breach of contract for refusal to provide coverage for expenses incurred after an automobile accident.

Before the Court is Davis’ motion to remand. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED.

II. Background

On September 7, 1987, Davis was struck by an automobile while riding a moped and suffered injuries. At the time, Davis was insured with State Farm under a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tuck v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gregoria Rosa v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Bialochowski v. Cross Concrete Pumping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API