Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Washtenaw Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1924No. Calendar 31,437, 31,438PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiffs in the above entitled cases are husband and wife. Each commenced a tort action in the circuit court of Washtenaw county against Dr. Scott C. Runnells and the regents of the University of Michigan to recover damages resulting from injuries alleged to have been wrongfully inflicted upon her (Fay Robinson) while a surgical patient in the University hospital. The questions involved in these mandamus proceedings are substantially the same in both cases and they were submitted upon the same briefs. Service was duly had upon defendants and similar declarations, each containing two counts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downes v. Harper HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bruce v. Central Methodist Episcopal ChurchMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Polanco v. Omnicell, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  3. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Todd v. Curators of Mo. UniversitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Daszkiewicz v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API