Zubik v. Burwell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Petitioners are primarily nonprofit organizations that provide health insurance to their employees. Federal regulations require petitioners to cover certain contraceptives as part of their health plans, unless petitioners submit a form either to their insurer or to the Federal Government, stating that they object on religious grounds to providing contraceptive coverage. Petitioners allege that submitting this notice substantially burdens the exercise of their religion, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 107 Stat. 1488 , 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq .
Following oral…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kiyemba v. ObamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Wheaton College v. Sylvia BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Burwell v. KorteSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of N. Y.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Commonwealth of MA v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Braidwood Management v. EEOCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.