Legal Opinion

Bowline v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 13, 1946No. 2 Div. 223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

The suit is in detinue by the administrator of the estate of Francis Bowline, deceased, against defendant C. K. Cox for the recovery of a diamond ring of the value of $2,000. There was verdict and judgment for the defendant, from which the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

It is clearly established by the proof that the ring in question formerly belonged to Francis Bowline, plaintiff’s intestate, who died at the age of 74 in December, 1945, and that on numerous occasions decedent had been seen wearing this ring. Bowline was a widower, his wife having died in 1939, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Davis v. WachterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Couch v. CouchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mantiply v. MantiplySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Grigsby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Adams v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Garrison v. GraysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Livingston v. TapscottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API