Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Foust v. Montez-Torres

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2015No. CV-14-192Published

1ConcurrenceKaren R. Baker, Justice

■ Although I wholeheartedly agree with the majority’s decision to affirm the circuit court’s finding that Foust did not stand in loco parentis to M.F. at the time of her petition for visitation — and I join it — I write separately because I conclude that Arkansas’s statutory scheme does not allow a petition for visitation filed outside of an action for divorce, paternity, or guardianship.

In the present case, Foust filed a petiT tion for visitation as an independent action; she did not filed her petition in conjunction with a complaint for divorce or guardianship, nor did she filed her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stamps v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Bethany v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Blackwood v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API