Foust v. Montez-Torres
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceKaren R. Baker, Justice
■ Although I wholeheartedly agree with the majority’s decision to affirm the circuit court’s finding that Foust did not stand in loco parentis to M.F. at the time of her petition for visitation — and I join it — I write separately because I conclude that Arkansas’s statutory scheme does not allow a petition for visitation filed outside of an action for divorce, paternity, or guardianship.
In the present case, Foust filed a petiT tion for visitation as an independent action; she did not filed her petition in conjunction with a complaint for divorce or guardianship, nor did she filed her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stamps v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Young v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Bethany v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Blackwood v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000