Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keels v. Chapin & Chapin, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1966No. 39271Published

1DissentMatthias, J.

The single issue presented in this case is whether the determination of the administrator is one involving the extent of disability, from which appeal is precluded by statute.

This court has held, in Szekely v. Young, Admr. (1963), 174 Ohio St. 213, and it is well settled, that:

“The only right of appeal to a court with respect to a claim for workmen’s compensation is such as may be provided for by statute. Industrial Commission v. Monroe (1924), 111 Ohio St. 812, 146 N. E. 213.

‘ ‘ The only statute providing for an appeal to the Common Pleas Court with respect to a claim for workmen’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Comm. of Ohio v. MonroeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wentzell v. Columbus Bolt & Forging Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API