Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 17, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 783Published

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Mr. Curtis Cosden is an incompetent ^person under guardianship. The appellee, “the Southern Arizona Bank and Trust Company, was appointed as guardian of his •estate and the appellant was appointed as guardian of his person.

The appellant filed a petition seeking a change of guardians on the ground that the Southern Arizona Bank and Trust Company had become unsuitable to serve as guardian and was detrimental to the health of Mr. Cosden. This petition was ■denied, and thus this appeal.

The disposition of this matter is ■governed by the interpretation of A.R.S. § 14-817 and § 14 —…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Guardianship of ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. In Re Farson's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. O'Brien v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. In re the Guardianship of FaielloNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API