George R. Shook v. Harold Clarke
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAGG, Circuit Judge.
George R. Shook appeals the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
Shook asserted three constitutional grounds for relief in his habeas petition. The Nebraska Supreme Court had ruled on one of Shook's habeas claims and the district court rejected this claim on the merits. Shook presented his other habeas claims in a state postconviction action. Shook's counsel, however, failed to raise these claims on appeal of the postconviction proceeding to the Nebraska Supreme Court. Despite Shook's contention that postconviction counsel was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Philip Shaddy v. Harold Clarke, Warden of the Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Victor James Harrod, Jr. v. Charles Black, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State v. MeisNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martsay Bolder, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Bill Armontrout, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Clarence Victor v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Lloyd Eugene Schlup v. Bill Armontrout, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Antonio Evans v. Denis DowdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Clarence Victor v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.