Legal Opinion

T.D. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1994No. C8-94-838Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Judge. *

This petition for a writ of prohibition seeks to restrain the district court from keeping a juvenile witness in custody pending the trial in which the juvenile has been subpoenaed to testify. We deny the petition.

FACTS

The prosecution subpoenaed petitioner T.D. to appear and to testify in a first-degree murder trial. T.D. was also subpoenaed to testify in another trial involving the same offense. After T.D. fahed to appear in the first trial, the district court found him in contempt and sentenced him to 30 days in the Juvenile Detention Center. The court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. PettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State ex rel. Howard v. GraceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API