Szturm v. Huntington Blizzard Hockey Associates Ltd. Partnership
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGRAW, Justice:
This case concerns whether an individual who is both a limited partner and management employee of a limited partnership is, by virtue of such status, presumptively prohibited from asserting a priority claim for wages upon dissolution of the partnership. Because the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (“RULPA”), W. Va.Code §§ 47-9-1 to - 63, expressly permits a partner of a limited partnership to transact business with the partnership and enjoy the same rights as a person who is not a partner, W. Va.Code § 47-9-7 (1981), we conclude that, as a general rule, a limited…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ElderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
- Burgess v. PorterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HonakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Thornton v. CAMC, ETC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
- Farley v. Zapata Coal Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shaffer v. FT. Henry Surgical Associates, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Fairmont Tool, Inc. v. Adam J. Davis, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly SituatedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021