Legal Opinion

People v. Mullhearn

New York Court of Special Session

Decided April 4, 1960Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam E. Ringel, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of disorderly conduct (Penal Law, § 722, subd. 2). He was arrested at 8:00 p.m., and arraigned, tried and convicted in Night Court (New York City Magistrates’ Court) within a few hours after his arrest. He was not represented by counsel.

While it cannot be concluded as a matter of law from the complaint and the evidence adduced at the trial below, that the defendant’s guilt may not have been established beyond a reasonable doubt (People v. Hipple, 263 N. Y. 242; People v. Sadowsky, 149 Misc. 583; People ex rel. Conley v. Frank, 245 App. Div. 777;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. People v. HippleNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. People v. ForteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. People v. HussockNew York Court of Special Session · 1940
  5. People v. SadowskyNew York Court of Special Session · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API