Mason v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentBoggs, Chief Judge
After we remanded to give the condemned exactly what he asked for, an ev-identiary hearing before a federal district judge, the learned trial judge carefully reviewed the evidence presented and correctly applied the relevant federal law under AEDPA and Strickland v. Washington. Today our court continues a distressing trend of finely parsing defense counsel judgments, based on the most charitable (to the condemned) or malevolent (to the defense counsel) view of facts and holds that counsel was constitutionally ineffective. I emphasize constitutionally because in a common-sense way, counsel was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Maurice A. Mason v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Van Hook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008