Legal Opinion

People v. Price

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*906Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s present challenge to the showup identification procedure as unduly suggestive was preserved by the issues raised at the pretrial suppression hearing (see People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533, 537 [1997]; People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990], cert denied 498 US 833 [1990]; People v Berry, 50 AD3d 1047, 1048 [2008]). However, the defendant’s contention that the showup identification procedure was unduly suggestive is without merit (see People v Lopez, 93 AD3d 808, 809 [2012]; People v Mais, 71 AD3d 1163, 1165 [2010]; People v Parris, 70 AD3d 725,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. MaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. ParrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API