Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paline v. Heroman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 13, 1946No. 38303Published

1DissentHawthorne, Justice

Plaintiff, Emile Paline, instituted this suit for specific performance of a contract for the purchase of a tract of land situated in the Ninth Ward of the Parish of East Baton Rouge, containing approximately 2.83 acres, the property being fully described in his petition.

Defendant, Fred I. Heroman, Jr., answered the suit, denying that plaintiff had a good and merchantable title to the property, and alleging that for this reason he refused to accept title to the real estate but that he was ready, willing, and able to take title if and when it was judicially determined that plaintiff had a clear…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Succession of BaumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
  2. Jacob v. FalgoustSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API