Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 10, 2011No. SC09-1382, SC10-143PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

Steven Richard Taylor appeals the denial of his amended motion for posteonviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Through his postconviction motion, Taylor challenges his capital murder conviction and sentence of death. Taylor has also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, through which he alleges ineffective assistance of appellate counsel due to counsel’s failure to raise several issues on direct appeal. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (9), Fla. Const. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.850…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  2. Barwick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  3. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida & SC18-1321 Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  5. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API