Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joseph Jones v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, LLC

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2014No. 2012-CT-00536-SCTPublished

1DissentKitchens, Justice

¶ 19. I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that no genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether Imperial Palace knew or should have known of a misaligned concrete parking bumper alleged to have caused injury to Joseph Jones. Additionally, a genuine issue of material fact existed with respect to whether reasonable inspections of the premises would have revealed the danger.

*323¶ 20. The majority opines that, “in the case before us today, the plaintiff produced no evidence that Imperial knew or had reason to know that the particular bumper that caused Jones’s injury was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Little v. Mississippi Department of TransportationMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. CargileMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Drennan v. Kroger Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pigg v. Express Hotel Partners, LLCMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Moore v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API