Legal Opinion

Portnoy v. McNamara

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1972No. 363-701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThoenton, J.

Plaintiff, a professional bail bondsman doing business in defendant city, brought suit in the circuit court for Multnomah County against the city and several of its officials challenging the validity of the city’s ordinance licensing and regulating bail bondsmen. ① In his suit plaintiff prayed for a decree “restraining defendants from taking any action interfering with plaintiff’s continuing his business, [and] declaring plaintiff is not subject to the claimed regulatory powers set forth in [the] ordinances * * After trial on the merits the court entered a decree for defendants and dismissed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allied Fidelity Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  2. Allied Fidelity Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API