Legal Opinion

Carter v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 19, 2009No. Civil Action 3:08-cv-01359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court in this class action suit is the plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Docket 35] and Motion to Remand for Voluntary Dismissal or in the Alternative for Voluntary Dismissal [Docket 50]. For the reasons herein, the Motion to Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is GRANTED and the Motion to Remand for Voluntary Dismissal is DENIED.

I. Background

This class action suit raises several claims based on the defendants’ alleged disposal of the agricultural herbicide 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners of Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014
  2. Feldman's Medical Center Pharmacy, Inc. v. CareFirst, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Hepstall v. Humana Health Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
  4. Katoria Development Group, LLC v. Encova Mutual Insurance Group, Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026
  5. The People of the State of Illinois, ex rel. Kwame Raoul, Attorney General v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API