Legal Opinion
Miler v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 1969No. 4836PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FICKLING, Associate Judge.
Appellant, along with another defendant, was convicted of attempted burglary, Secs. 22-103, 22-1801 (b) (Supp. II, 1968), petit larceny, Sec. 22-2202, and malicious destruction of property, Sec. 22-403, (D.C. Code 1967), and each defendant was sentenced to 360 days, 360 days, and 180 days respectively, with the sentences to run consecutively. Only Miler appeals.
Upon carefully examining the record, we find no error in the trial of the case and, therefore, the convictions are affirmed. However, we remand for resentencing since the sentencing process was improper.
*498After…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Leroy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Weeks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Jalbert v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oscar Poteet v. William Fauver, Warden, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- German v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. PoteetSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Hebble v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.