Legal Opinion

Eastman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 22, 1980No. 538-78PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion, filed August 14, 1980, moving that the court adopt the recommended decision of Trial Judge Roald A. Hogenson, filed July 10, 1980, pursuant to Rule 134(h), since plaintiffs have filed no notice of intention to except or exceptions thereto and the time for so filing pursuant to the Rules of the court has expired. Upon consideration thereof, *299without oral argument, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby grants defendant’s motion and affirms and adopts the recommended decision…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Golanty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Margit Sigray Bessenyey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Dunn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  4. Bessenyey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  5. Patterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hunter Faulconer, Sr. And Mary T. Faulconer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. The Brook, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Charla Gates Cannon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Free-Pacheco v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API