Cronin v. Logansport Daily Reporter Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom White Circuit Court; Charles W. Hanley, Special Judge. Action by Bessie Cronin against the Logansport Daily Reporter Company and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, the .plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
— The errors assigned and relied on for reversal in this cause are that the court erred (1) in overruling appellant’s motion for a continuance, and (2) in overruling appellant’s motion to reinstate said cause.
1. The overruling of a motion for a continuance is cause for a new trial, but cannot be made an independent assignment or error, and when so assigned, no question is presented. Arbuckle v. McCoy (1876), 53 Ind. 63; Westerfield v. Spencer (1878), 61 Ind. 339; Hutts v. Shoaf (1882), 88 Ind. 395.
2. Appellant has waived the second specification of error, by failing to set out in her brief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Westerfield v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Hutts v. ShoafIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Cronin v. KeeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Arbuckle v. McCoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cronin v. KeeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912