Wooten v. Daniels
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Per curiam
This case was erroneously placed on our docket as an appeal. The only document filed with this court is a letter from the father of the claimant Mark Wooten requesting an extension of the deadline for filing a petition for review with this court. Thus, there has been no appeal in this case.
We deny the request for extension for two reasons. First, we have no authority to extend the 15-day deadline for filing petition for review as prescribed in Ark. Stat. Ann., § 81-1107(d)(7)""(Supp. 1979)- Secondly, the o'nly evidence presented by claimant’s father with respect to his authority to act for…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cockrell v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Branson v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Green v. Director, Employment Security DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Woodus v. Director of LaborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983