Legal Opinion

Blaschock v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1990No. 2200 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Before this Court is the petition for review filed by John Blaschock (Claimant) from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s calculation of Claimant’s average weekly wage under Section 309(e) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 582(e). The sole issue presented is whether the referee incorrectly calculated the average weekly wage of Claimant contrary to provisions of Section 309 of the Act. The Board’s order is vacated, and this matter is remanded.

Claimant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Froehly v. HartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. American Mutual Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Follett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blaschock v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API