Legal Opinion

Field v. Roosa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

The bill in this case was originally brought against Edwin S. Roosa and Albert K. Page, called in the bill Charles H. Paige, but the misnomer was cured by an amendment. It appears from the master’s report that the plaintiff had let the west store, No. 43 Pleasant Street in Worcester, to Lucius Merrifield, for a term of five years from April 24, 1889, with the right in the lessee to underlet but not to assign the lease. On December 18, 1890, Merrifield, then being in possession of the store under this lease, sold the stock of musical instruments, etc. in the store to the defendant Roosa. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Lynde v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Lubricant Corp. v. SoconyVacuum Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Flesher v. HandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Keith v. de BussigneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Bruce v. HARVARD TRUST COMPANYMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  5. Field v. EarlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API