Legal Opinion

State v. Banks

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 25, 2013No. AC 33326; AC 33387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAYINE, J.

The principal questions raised in these consolidated appeals are whether the state may obtain a DNA sample from a felon in the custody of the commissioner of correction (commissioner) who was convicted of crimes prior to the enactment of General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 54-102g and whether, prior to the passage of Public Acts 2011, No. 11-144, § 1 (P.A. 11-144), which amended § 54-102g, it was permissible for the trial court to grant the state permission to use reasonable physical force to obtain a DNA sample. We answer both questions in the affirmative and affirm the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. State v. DrakesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. State v. DrakesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API