Legal Opinion

Hansee v. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Kings county court. Action for personal injuries by William A. Hansee against the Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company. Plaintiff had judgment, from which, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The proof established a clear case of negligence against the defendant. On the 20th of December, 1886, plaintiff was a passenger on the defendant’s cars, and, while he was in the act of getting off the train, the conductor, who was intoxicated, pulled the door shut, with a great deal of force, and caught the plaintiff’s right hand, and quite seriously injured him. The jury found a verdict of $300. The verdict is very moderate, if' the plaintiff’s evidence be credited. The only question, therefore, upon appeal, is whether any error was committed on the trial. V-The defendant offered on the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kenan v. Matuszeski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API