Legal Opinion
In Re Tempo Technology Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 25, 1996No. Civil Action 95-438/95-478PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 14,1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware entered an order approving the sale of substantially of the assets of the Tempo Technology Corporation (“the Debtor”) to the Tempo Acquisition Corporation (“TAC”) pursuant to section 363(b)(1) of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Bankruptcy Record (“B.R.”) 42. An unsecured creditor of the Debtor, Diamond Abrasives Corporation (“Diamond Abrasives”), timely filed this appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order on June 22, 1995. B.R. 51. Four…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Sharon Steel Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Dwg Corporation and Victor PosnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schepis v. Burtch (In Re Pursuit Capital Management, LLC)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Raskin v. MalloyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1997
- Badami v. Burgess (In Re Burgess)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- In Re CarrettaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re Triangle Transport, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.