Legal Opinion
Byer v. Szandrowski
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 14, 1931No. [No. 67, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
The lull of complaint here considered was filed by the appellants against Alexander Szandrowski, and Marie Szandrowski. his wife. The defendants interposed a demurrer to the bill; and the chancellor sustained the demurrer of the wife and overruled that of the husband, with leave to him to answer. The appeal is from the order sustaining the demurrer on behalf of the defendant wife without leave to amend. The allegations of the bill, which for a determination of the question presented arc assumed to be facts, may be briefly but substantially thus stated:
In May, 1926, the plaintiffs Stanley I.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Springer v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Coyne v. Supreme Conclave of the Improved Order of HeptasophsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Green v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- McIntyre v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wimmer v. WimmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Turner v. Emmons & Wilson, Inc. (In Re Minton Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Institutional Management Corp. v. Translation Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1978
- Chamberlain v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.