Grauman v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
An 1885 statute provides that the purchaser of the receipt of any ginner, warehouse-holder, cotton factor or other bailee of farm products shall not be held to be an innocent purchaser of such produce as against a landlord’s lien. Ark. Stats. 1947, § 51-205. The principal question in this case of first impression is whether the above statute, to the extent that it purports to give the landlord priority over the purchaser of a negotiable warehouse receipt, has been repealed by the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act, adopted in 1915. Ibid., §§ 68-1201—68-1258.
The facts may be stated in a few…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holland Banking Co. v. BoothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- City Nat. Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- McGee v. CarverMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Peoria Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Starkey v. NixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Securities Investment Co. v. CohenMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Ouachita Industries v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963