Legal Opinion

Grauman v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1950No. 4-9038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

An 1885 statute provides that the purchaser of the receipt of any ginner, warehouse-holder, cotton factor or other bailee of farm products shall not be held to be an innocent purchaser of such produce as against a landlord’s lien. Ark. Stats. 1947, § 51-205. The principal question in this case of first impression is whether the above statute, to the extent that it purports to give the landlord priority over the purchaser of a negotiable warehouse receipt, has been repealed by the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act, adopted in 1915. Ibid., §§ 68-1201—68-1258.

The facts may be stated in a few…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. BoothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. City Nat. Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. McGee v. CarverMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Peoria Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Starkey v. NixonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities Investment Co. v. CohenMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ouachita Industries v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API