Legal Opinion

Capriglione v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1964No. 49942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Mrs. Capriglione sought $25,000 as damages for alleged personal injuries she sustained as the result of the averred negligence of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a corporation. We shall sometimes refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court. A jury’s verdict was for the defendant. The trial court granted plaintiff a new trial for the stated reason that the court erred in giving contributory negligence instruction 3-A. Defendant appealed from the new trial order and contends the trial court erred in refusing to direct a defendant’s verdict at the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knight Ex Rel. Knight v. RicheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Burr v. SinghSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Daniels v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Nelson v. O'LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Danner v. WeinreichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bridgeforth v. ProffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Rakestraw v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Deskin v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Teichman v. Potashnick Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API