Capriglione v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
Mrs. Capriglione sought $25,000 as damages for alleged personal injuries she sustained as the result of the averred negligence of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a corporation. We shall sometimes refer to the parties as they were designated in the trial court. A jury’s verdict was for the defendant. The trial court granted plaintiff a new trial for the stated reason that the court erred in giving contributory negligence instruction 3-A. Defendant appealed from the new trial order and contends the trial court erred in refusing to direct a defendant’s verdict at the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knight Ex Rel. Knight v. RicheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Burr v. SinghSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Daniels v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Nelson v. O'LearySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Danner v. WeinreichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Bridgeforth v. ProffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Rakestraw v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Deskin v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Teichman v. Potashnick Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.