William A. Rogers, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
Plaintiff imported from West Germany merchandise conceded to be portable engine-driven blowers. The collector at Chicago classified the blowers as machines, not specially provided for, and assessed duty at 11½ per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108.
*422Plaintiff’s protest claim is that the blowers are entitled to duty free entry as agricultural implements, pursuant to paragraph 1604.
The competing tariff provisions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Mohns Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sortex Co. of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968