Legal Opinion

Van Kleek v. Farmers Ins. Exch.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2014No. S-13-1006Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 730 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS An appellate court is not obligated to engage in an analysis that is not necessary to adjudicate the case and controversy before it. Carey v. City of Hastings, 287 Neb. 1,

840 N.W.2d 868

(2013). VI. CONCLUSION The district court erred in concluding that the Florida court’s order denying leave to amend precluded appellants’ complaint against Ward. We reverse the judgment of the district court that sustained Ward’s motion to dismiss, and we remand the cause for further proceedings. R eversed and remanded for further proceedings. Jennifer Van K…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guzman v. BarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Security National Insurance Company v. Sequoyah MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  3. Boettger v. Early American Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Malik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API