Legal Opinion

Lefrak v. Lambert

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 13, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of the court below (89 Mise 2d 197) unanimously *633modified by increasing the amount of plaintiffs recovery to $4,222 plus attorney’s fees in the sum of $750; as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Defendant herein vacated his apartment before the expiration of his term and plaintiff relet it some months thereafter. It is our opinion that under the circumstances herein plaintiff is entitled to prevail on his cause of action to recover rent for the period that the apartment remained vacant.

While there seems to be a trend whereby the courts have been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Birchwood Associates v. SternAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paragon Industries, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1983
  2. Rubin v. DondyshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
  3. Wallis v. Falken-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Miller v. North Shore Towers AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Schnee v. Jonas Equities, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API