Marn v. Reynolds
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In the above-entitled cause, petitioner has filed a petition for rehearing together with a rather unique motion entitled a Motion to Withdraw and Amend the *685Opinion. Both are consolidated in this ruling for the reason that the motion is incorporated in the petition by reference and we deem it to have no independent status. In the light of the matters presented in the petition proper, we have reviewed the court’s opinion and find that the points urged by petitioner are repetitive, being similar in substance to those heretofore raised in his briefs and argument on appeal. They were fully…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Bettencourt v. BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Appeal of GoodfaderHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- King v. Ilikai Properties, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
- Island Holidays, Inc. v. FitzgeraldHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.