Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Hemenway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal- from Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Bill to foreclose a mortgage. Defendants Wile and Hartwell appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by Hiram F. Hemenway and wife. At the time the mortgage was executed upon lots 9 and 10, some buildings were situated thereon, which were thereafter removed. The testimony abundantly shows that the two lots were only of the value of about $50 at the time the mortgage waB given, aside from the buildings, and are worth no more now. No question is raised but that J. F. Partridge & Bro. paid full value for the mortgage,— $400, — and that it was assigned to the complainant for value. At the time she took it the property was not of greater value…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Summers v. BromleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Johnson v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Mills v. PopeMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Sanford v. KunkelUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Dakota Loan & Trust Co. v. ParmaleeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API