Legal Opinion

State v. Raikes

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 22, 2013No. 108,809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

Shane Raikes was convicted in a bench trial of possession or control of a hallucinogenic drug after he failed to complete tire drug court diversion program. He appeals, claiming he was denied his right to a juiy trial. Because of the clear imperative announced in our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Irving, 216 Kan. 588, 533 P.2d 1225 (1975), we conclude that Raikes’ written waiver of his right to a jury trial in his diversion agreement was insufficient in and of itself to support a waiver of his constitutional right to trial by jury. We recognize that the consequence of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. IrvingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. State v. OttingerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. LarracoCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YounkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API