Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Ruhl

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J,) The facts axe stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This record presents an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City, passed on the 16th day of May, 1918, dismissing" the plaintiff’s bill of complaint, filed therein on the 14th of February, 1918.

The bill is filed by the plaintiff as trustee and executor of Anna Maria Rnhl, deceased, and also in his own right as an alleged party in interest against Conrad Ruhl, Jr., executor of Conrad Ruhl, Sr., deceased; Conrad Ruhl, Jr., surviving partner of C. Ruhl and Sons, and also against Conrad Ruhl, Jr., and Henry Ruhl, in their individual capacity as parties in interest.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. ShirkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  2. Rice v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  3. Drew Chem. Corp. v. Amer. Fore Loyalty GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Kramer v. Town of MontclairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. France v. APA Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API