Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Lyda

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1992No. D-1597PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Writ of Error to the Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas

2Per curiam

In this cause, we determine that an attorney ad litem is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses for representing unknown heirs on appeal. Marjorie Cahill (“Cahill”) sued the record owners and unknown heirs of a fifteen acre tract of land (“the Rhodes tract”) adjacent to her property to establish title by adverse possession. Service of citation was by publication and the trial court appointed an attorney ad litem to represent the unknown heirs. By agreement of the parties, a receiver…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Executors of the Estate of Tartt v. HarpoldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. J.D. Abrams, Inc. v. McIverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Franks v. Roades, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. XTO Energy Inc. v. NikolaiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  4. Fletcher v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Garza v. Slaughter, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API