Holland v. Tootle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceEvans, Judge
I concur specially in the judgment affirming the lower court, and do so reluctantly, because I feel there was error in the charge to the jury, but that under the very strict and stringent rules imposed by this court respecting such matters, appellant did not properly complain thereof. In *189enumeration of error number 2 objection was, in my opinion, properly made to the charge of the court that, ". . . it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that skidding was the result of negligent operation of the automobile by the defendant, Jane Tootle,” because this plaintiff did not contend that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Black v. AultmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Gaillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930