Legal Opinion

Mallard v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 30, 2003No. 02-6477PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Arthur Louis Mallard, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Mallard filed a § 2241 petition in May 2002. He alleged that his conviction and sentence were invalid because: (1) the government erred by including the amount of profit and property owned by him into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. John T. Martin v. Edward PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. OrmondDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
  2. Bryson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
  3. Dillon v. GilleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  4. Fish v. LeMasterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  5. Glass v. PaulDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API